DISH Asks IPTV Sellers to Share Users’ Details

[basejumper]

DISH Asks IPTV Sellers to Share Users' Details - Fire Stick Tricks

Food for thought.

 

[bazcfc1]

DISH Asks IPTV Sellers to Share Users' Details - Fire Stick Tricks

Food for thought.

Thats cause a provider passed all their end user details on it mentioned it in a thread I put on forum

 

[basejumper]

The one in your post must be a different case.

In this case DISH Network is asking Boom Media to disclose it's end users data and they have refused. Boom Media is unwilling to share their partner and user information and hence DISH Network must take the case to trial to get access to it. So Boom Media are asking for a donation of more than $250,000. from end users to pay their legal costs to fight it out.

Boom Media is a reseller for Nitro TV, Epic IPTV, Beast TV, Vader Streams, MFG TV, OK2, Murica Streams and others.

My thoughts are:
Boom media are asking for money from its customers NOT to disclose their data - I would call that a protection racket. What is to stop them just wiping all of their customers data out and not charging them any money?

Boom media must be close to the master stream to resell all of those other streams. We saw how when xtream codes was busted it affected all of us. Does anyone really think that by using fake emails and paying for IPTV with gift cards or bitcoins using VPN etc they would be untraceable?

It seems like the big companies who have the most to lose by IPTV users are now going after the IPTV users and not the providers.

 

[bazcfc1]

The one in your post must be a different case.

In this case DISH Network is asking Boom Media to disclose it's end users data and they have refused. Boom Media is unwilling to share their partner and user information and hence DISH Network must take the case to trial to get access to it. So Boom Media are asking for a donation of more than $250,000. from end users to pay their legal costs to fight it out.

Boom Media is a reseller for Nitro TV, Epic IPTV, Beast TV, Vader Streams, MFG TV, OK2, Murica Streams and others.

My thoughts are:
Boom media are asking for money from its customers NOT to disclose their data - I would call that a protection racket. What is to stop them just wiping all of their customers data out and not charging them any money?

Boom media must be close to the master stream to resell all of those other streams. We saw how when xtream codes was busted it affected all of us. Does anyone really think that by using fake emails and paying for IPTV with gift cards or bitcoins using VPN etc they would be untraceable?

It seems like the big companies who have the most to lose by IPTV users are now going after the IPTV users and not the providers.

Its on about another supplier in mine mate

 

[river4ever]

Does anyone really think that by using fake emails and paying for IPTV with gift cards or bitcoins using VPN etc they would be untraceable?

It seems like the big companies who have the most to lose by IPTV users are now going after the IPTV users and not the providers.

I think the above quote is scare mongering. As of 6th of december 2019 not “one single end user” has been advised or warned in court with streaming from local IP*V domains.
P2P is different matter.

You question “bitcoin”... “giftcard”...
(gift cards used on pre-paid)

VPN on connection to server.
(no logging VPN)
Anyone with understanding knows what way “not” to accept payment(s).
But the confusion is around why “bitcoin”... “VPN”.... pre-paid cards supplying “gift cards” is not secure?

To say big companies......
IE: Sly, Vermin and others have approached those end users is open to debate.
Have you got any information to show what you posted about end users being prosecuted on soon to be?
(as news to me)